top of page
file.jpg
  • Writer's pictureEthan Semendinger

MLB Implements 2023 Rule Changes

The Manfred Era continues their constant rules changing each and every year. In this iteration we have a new pitch clock and a shift ban.

 

Tweet:

To read up about the rule changes in their entireties, check out the MLB.com article, here:


As a disclaimer, this is a post about the brief history of each discussed rule change and my opinions on each.

 

The Pitch Clock:

The History:

An idea originated to as a measure to speed up the pace of play in baseball, the Southeastern Conference (SEC) first experimented with using a pitch clock during their 2010 season. They opted to use a 20 second clock for the pitcher (allowing a free ball if violated) and a 5 second countdown limit on the batter for staying in the box (allowing a free strike if violated). That next season, in 2011, the NCAA implemented a pitch clock for all college baseball- though, only when no runners were on base.


The Arizona Fall League was the first professional baseball league to start using a pitch clock in 2014. After a successful implementation, the MLB announced that it would become standard for the 2015 season in Double-A and Triple-A. It then became a consideration for the MLB in 2018 with a first enrollment during the 2019 Spring Training.

---

My Thoughts:

Ultimately, I have no problem with a pitch clock. It has been used in the minor leagues for a while now during which they've seen a consistent theme that the game has moved quicker. Which, if that is the end result I am happy with it.


My worry is that the extra 20-30 minutes saved will very quickly be taken over my additional commercials during breaks, more cutaways during broadcasts to advertisements, and other unnecessary elements towards the TV watching experience. Such is the world we live in...

 

The Shift:

The History:

While the shift has become increasingly popular from the late-2000s as a method to squash opposing hitters in the recent years, the history of the shift actually dates back to 100 years ago. Many people like to site the fact that the Cleveland Indians, through manager Lou Boudreau, would shift on Ted Williams to keep him from getting on base with his pull-friendly left-handed swing. However, the first noted implementation of the shift goes all the way back to the 1920's when teams used different infield alignments against Cy Williams.


In recent years the idea of banning the shift has become a popular topic as a way to (hopefully) reduce the continuing "meta" towards three-true-outcome hitting (home run, walk, strikeout).

---

My Thoughts:

I was a big proponent against banning the shift, but my Dad opened my eyes to the reality of the situation we currently have in the MLB. As much as I want to preach Wee Willie Keelers famous words, "Hit 'em where they aint," that does not happen anymore. Hits that, historically, would've always found a gap are too often being turned into easy groundballs on the left side of the infield for the second baseman to grab.


So, if the question is whether or not I'd increase the chance to see baseball as it should be played- with the first and third baseman near their bases and the shortstop and second baseman halfway between first/third base and second base- or if I'd like to continue to see nice hits be scooped up, I'm siding with the hitters. I can only hope this change will bring back the days of more .300 AVG hitters, increase the traffic on the base paths, and move hitting philosophy back towards a contact-first approach over the "home run or bust" way that too many teams prioritize today.


The game, as a whole, when 18 players on each side strike out, is boring. Trust me, we'll all be thankful for this change next year.

 

Bigger Bases:

The History:

Since the beginning of baseball there have been many questions about the size of the bases. Going all the way back to 1857, the first written rules of baseball made sure to include that the size of a base should be one square foot and painted white. This wouldn't hold, however. In the 1860's, player Henry Chadwick tried to argue for a base that was 17 inches by 14 inches. Though, history can not indicate if these specifications were ever used.


Starting in 1877, a new rule change had it be that the bases would be 15 inches by 15 inches.


If you want to read more about the history of bases and foul lines, and general baseball history, you can read more about it here: http://www.19cbaseball.com/field-9.html.

---

My Thoughts:

Have I given the bigger bases any thought? Of course I have! I have thoughts on everything.


This is a stupid rule change. The bases have been 15 inches by 15 inches for over 150 years. Some things should just be left alone. This is one of those things.


Base-stealing will not become big again just because they cut down on a few inches between the bags. Base-stealing will see an uptick next April and May when players and teams want to test the waters. And then, pitchers and catchers will adapt and the rate of stealing will drop again. Just like what happened in the NFL when they moved the PAT attempt back. Kickers adapted quickly and there has been barely any change now from back then.


At the very least, allow us to see what the (hopeful) increase of baserunners from banning the shift will do to baserunning and stealing for a few years before adding this new change as well. Sometimes the slower approach of implementation is better in the grand scheme of things.


This just seems frivolous.


6 Comments


Len
Len
Sep 13, 2022

Pitch clock only.

Like

yankeesblog
Sep 09, 2022

I'm on board with the pitch clock and banning the shift. I agree that bigger bases are silly and frivolous but I don't really care enough about that change to complain.

I hope that MLB/TV networks will not negate the time saved with the pitch clock with more ads but I'm not opposed to brief cutaways if they're not too frequent and obtrusive. It would be nice if there were more all-field hitters but that's a skill not everyone has or can develop. It would take years for players who have been groomed under a different philosophy to make that adjustment or to be replaced by a new breed of players groomed to hit to all fields. With the velocity, nasty…

Like

Robert Malchman
Robert Malchman
Sep 09, 2022

I hate the shift ban. Learn to go the other way. If that means the dead-pull hitters like Gallo (or before him, Teixiera) go the way of the dodo, excellent. Give me a line-up half-or-more full of LeMahieus any day. This won't fix TTO baseball; it will exacerbate it.

Like
Robert Malchman
Robert Malchman
Sep 10, 2022
Replying to

Baseball "is supposed to be hard. If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. It's the hard that makes it great." -Tom Hanks, A League of Their Own


If you're the best, a major leaguer, you beat the other team whether there's a shift on or not. If you can't do it, if you can't take what the defense gives you, you don't belong in the Major Leagues.


This isn't a rule to prevent unfair trickery, like the infield fly rule; nor is it a rule to protect player safety, like banning spitballs or PEDs. It's not even a rule like the DH, which is designed to showcase what each player does best, hit or pitch, instead of forcing the…

Like

Andy Singer
Andy Singer
Sep 09, 2022

I'm not a big fan of pitch clocks, but that's coming from someone who loves the natural rhythm of the game (I also loved pulling the fake shake-off until you step off to mess with hitter timing, but that's another story). I get what MLB is doing, but completely agree, Ethan, that if this results in more commercials, I'll scream.


Paul and EJ had finally convinced me that something should be done about the shift, but I think this rule is too extreme; I wanted to see a rule that infielders had to keep their feet on the infield dirt, not necessarily two on either side of the bag. I really only care that line drives to the outfield an…


Like
dr sem.png

Start Spreading the News is the place for some of the very best analysis and insight focusing primarily on the New York Yankees.

(Please note that we are not affiliated with the Yankees and that the news, perspectives, and ideas are entirely our own.)

blog+image+2.jpeg

Have a question for the Weekly Mailbag?

Click below or e-mail:

SSTNReaderMail@gmail.com

SSTN is proudly affiliated with Wilson Sporting Goods! Check out our press release here, and support us by using the affiliate links below:

587611.jpg
583250.jpg
Scattering the Ashes.jpeg

"Scattering The Ashes has all the feels. Paul Russell Semendinger's debut novel taps into every emotion. You'll laugh. You'll cry. You'll reexamine those relationships that give your life meaning." — Don Burke, writer at The New York Post

The Least Among Them.png

"This charming and meticulously researched book will remind you of baseball’s power to change and enrich lives far beyond the diamond."

—Jonathan Eig, New York Times best-selling author of Luckiest Man, Opening Day, and Ali: A Life

From Compton to the Bronx.jpg

"A young man from Compton rises to the highest levels of baseball greatness.

Considered one of the classiest baseball players ever, this is Roy White's story, but it's also the story of a unique period in baseball history when the Yankees fell from grace and regained glory and the country dealt with societal changes in many ways."

foco-yankees.png

We are excited to announce our new sponsorship with FOCO for all officially licensed goods!

FOCO Featured:
carlos rodon bobblehead foco.jpg
bottom of page