NY Times: Nov. 8, 1978
- Paul Semendinger

- Dec 6, 2025
- 1 min read
By Paul Semendinger
December 6, 1978
***
The discussion on who deserved the 1978 MVP is summarized well in this article from the New York Times the day after the award was announced.
In short, this article makes the point that the decision was a very close one and that both players had a rightful claim on the award.
The article also shows that a New York writer voted for Jim Rice. This further illustrates the fact that Guidry not winning the award was not anti-Yankees bias.
Read on: NY TIMES : Rice Is MVP., Guidry 2d
















In 1978 Pitchers had the CY Young, hitters had the MVP, and according to our family friend Burt, Pitchers need something extraordinary with no spectacular offensive player in order to grab the MVP. Jim Rice had a great hitting season.
P.S. I don't agree with Jim Rice as a HOF.
"Rice, with most of New England, had contended that a day‐in, dayout player was more valuable. Pitchers, he said, had their award with the Cy Young Trophy."
So Rice, on top of choking in the one-game playoff, is also a hypocrite: AL pitchers won MVP's in 1971, 1981, 1984 and 1986. Where were all the New Englanders outraged by Roger Clemens' MVP because he was merely a pitcher?
"But the Yankee left‐hander halted long enough to give his lawyer a statement congratulating’ Rice ('His statistics were deserving of the award') and net once suggesting that he had been over‐: looked because he was a pitcher and not a hitter. He added that he was 'not disappointed and by not receiving…
you're not going to make your case about the absence of anti-Yankee bias by illustrating that Rice rec'd 20 first-place votes to only 8 for Guidry.
you do make a reasonable case for the fair-mindedness of New York-based sportswriters
and the awful bigotry of the ones based in Newark.
it's long been evident that the people in New Jersey resent their lowly station in life