by Paul Semendinger
October 23, 2023
***
I made this point in the comments of an article about Jordan Montgomery the other day. I then decided it needed its own article:
I have a fair question to every Yankees fan...
If all things were equal, would you play for the Yankees over a club like the Dodgers, Braves, Phillies, Rays, Orioles, Rangers, Astros, etc...
I love the Yankees. My dream has always been to play for them. I write about them every single day. BUT, if I were a Major League Baseball player, and any of those other teams offered me a similar contract, I'd go to those teams. Absolutely. 100%. This isn't because I don't like the Yankees. I love them. But as a professional, it would also be clear that my career would have a better chance of thriving with a better run organization. That's just the way it is.
I do not think the Yankees, as a franchise, outside of the fact that they won a ton of World Series, many years ago, and have history on their side, are a prime destination for many players. Sure, they'd love the allure of pinstripes. Sure, they'd love being part of Yankees history, but, in a real sense, what do the Yankees of today have to offer players?
Many players come to the Yankees and fail.
Most Yankees prospects fail to produce or find any success in the big leagues.
Many players leave the Yankees and perform (much) better.
These are facts. These facts are undisputable.
Also, if one looks through the weeds, I don't think their management team is well-thought of in the game. I'll ask a simple question...
Why is it that most teams (if we are to believe the Yankees) always seem to ask for more players in a deal from the Yankees than any other team? Is it possible that it is because they'd rather not deal with the Yankees' front office? Isn't that a possibility? I think this is more of a possibility than the idea that other GMs don't want to be burned by Brian Cashman. How many current GMs has he even burned? Yet, that is the excuse we often hear. The fact of the matter over the last few years is that much of the time, it's the Yankees that get burned. Just looking at this from a distance - If it seems it is difficult to deal with a team, maybe the problem is the leaders of that team, rather than the other guys (although, again, most often we are told it's the other way around).
Also, again, if one digs deep enough under the surface, he can find examples of Yankees icons like Bernie Williams, Derek Jeter, and even Aaron Judge critiquing the way that their negotiations were handed by Brian Cashman. We see stories that follow a similar pattern, "I felt disrespected after all the years I gave the club," and "We asked one thing, for the negotiations to be kept private... and then we saw the reports in the media. We didn't share that stuff... it was the Yankees." It seems that all too often the greatest Yankees' tenures with the team ends, not in glory, but in strife. The other players around the league, their agents, and etc., have to know this.
Would you go to a ball club that disrespects you in the end? I don't think I would.
There was a time when players would desire playing for the Yankees because they felt that the Yankees would do everything in their power to win. That is clearly no longer the case. Other teams are bigger winners. The Yankees have won one World Series since 2001. That's a long time. Since the All-Star break in 2022, a year-and-a-half now, the Yankees are basically a .500 team.
Are the Yankees ascending or, even after a long long period with no championships, still on the downturn?
It is my contention that there are a host of clubs that are better run than the Yankees.
What are the selling points to play for the Yankees in 2024 if all other things (years, contract value) are equal?
Is the Yankees' scouting better?
Is their player development better?
Is their decision making better?
Does their medical staff properly treat injuries and recovering players?
Do you feel they have a top notch coaching staff with the MLB team?
Do they invest more in winning?
Is their manager seen as one of the best?
Is their stadium one of the best places to play?
I'm serious about this.
What is there to make a player say, "The Yankees are the place to go that'll further my career, my skills, and give me the best chance to win?"
I am very interested in our readers' reactions to this question. If you were a big league star and the Yankees offered you the same contract as any of the top teams in the game today, would you sign with the Yankees or another club?
If you'd sign with the Yankees, please explain why. If it's the fact that you've always been a fan or that the Yankees used to be winners, I'm afraid that those reasons won't guide players today.
I'd like to know, what is it about the Yankees today that makes them an appealing destination for the game's biggest stars - or really for any available free agent?
I think the answer to this question is telling and it is a clear indication that something is terribly wrong with the Yankees today.
***
A note to other baseball writers, podcasters, talkers, and the like - if you borrow or use any of these ideas, do the right thing and give credit where credit is due - to the author and to this site.
google seo…
03topgame 03topgame
gamesimes gamesimes;
Fortune Tiger…
Fortune Tiger…
Fortune Tiger…
EPS Machine…
EPS Machine…
seo seo
betwin betwin;
777 777;
slots slots;
Fortune Tiger…
谷歌seo优化 谷歌SEO优化+外链发布+权重提升;
You are correct. The Yankees would have to overpay or offer the most money to obtain a free agent. The Yankees were a mess when Steinbrenner acquired the team from CBS. A below .500 team with a minor league system in disarray. They, like the current Yankees are losers with poor management and a CBS ownership that did not want to spend money on the team. George changed all of that. He wanted to win, not be "competitive" , but win the World Series every year. I remember sportswriters mocking whims unrealistic.. But that was his mission and the goal. These Yankees care more about making money. The Yankees earned &672 million dollars last year. More than any other team…
If all things were equal, would you play for the Mets or the Angels or the Red Sox or either club in Chicago over a club like the Braves, Phillies, Rays, Orioles, Rangers, etc...
the question is a bit inexact, perhaps better phrased as asking whether a free agent would prefer to sign with the clubs currently doing well rather than the teams doing less well.
we might note that Ohtani signed with the Angels
and all sorts of guys signed with the very unsuccessful and notoriously poorly-run club in Queens.
the Rangers had a well-deserved reputation for being a place unattractive for good pitchers.
Colorado as well.
~~~~~~
or perhaps it really is a question of whether the Yankees…
This is not complicated. Human nature dictates that young, talented players would not hitch themselves to a failing organization, nor would anyone else. Until the Yankees regain the luster of the past and make the Bronx the place to go, you'll see players opt for more well-run organizations. Sadly, the word is out.
Paul could not agree with you more. Athletes think of two things first money and second the chance. To win a championship. Today there are more teams who pay and want to win a title. The Yanks used to be first in both of these sadly no longer. At one time ballplayers wanted to play for the Yanks as they were guaranteed WorldSeries or bust. Those days are long gone and unless Hal does an about face the Yanks will continue to be run of the mill